This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Radiation Assurance is for all studies involving ionising radiation which are taking place in NHS/HSC secondary care settings.

How does the process work?

Radiation Assurance is a pre-submission review, which takes place before e-submission of the IRAS Form and before an application is made to the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC).

Once we've received your study application, we will conduct a consistency review, which ensures that regulators and sites receive consistent information across an application.

Please make sure you include all of the required documents.

You can view our consistency review criteria on the IRAS website.

If you plan to submit your application via the combined review process, separate guidance is available.

You will also need to tell us which management route you would like your study to be processed through.

Once we've completed the consistency review, the study can be sent for review by the Medical Physics Expert(s) (MPEs) and Clinical Radiation Expert(s) (CREs).

There are two management routes for Radiation Assurance:

HRA-managed 

This process is managed by the HRA on behalf of the applicant and involves a review fee payable to the reviewing trusts, organisations or independent reviewers. Applicants should be aware that if a study involves multiple modalities, for example radiology and radiotherapy, it may be necessary to select more than one MPE and CRE reviewer to complete the review, which can impact on the overall cost of the review fees payable. For further details on review fees and nation variability, please read our Payments Framework Guidance.

Applicants submitting studies through the HRA-managed route have the choice to request up to three trusts, health boards or individual reviewers for the HRA to approach to undertake the review. Alternatively, we will select appropriate HRA-registered reviewers with the appropriate expertise in the clinical specialisms and modalities required by the study.

This flow chart shows the process for the HRA-managed route.

Radiation Assurance HRA-managed flowchart
Long description

Self-managed

Applicants submitting studies through the self-managed route will manage the selection of reviewers and the review process. Reviewers undertaking the review on behalf of the applicant should meet the following criteria:

Applicants are expected to have a contract in place with their chosen reviewers when they submit their application for self-managed review. We recommend that this includes timelines and the agreed fee for completion of the review. There is further information on fees in our Payments Framework Guidance.

Applicants should specify which reviewers have been selected when registering their application for self-managed review. If they have reviewers that they prefer to use who are not currently registered with us, applicants should them to regsiter with the HRA. More information is available on our reviewer registration page.

As part of this route, applicants will still submit all of their study documentation for registration and have a consistency review conducted by the HRA.

This flow chart shows the process for the self-managed process. 

Radiation Assurance self-managed process
Long description

What are the timelines for review?

We are currently testing a timeline for HRA-managed studies of a maximum of 40 calendar days (excluding queries). For self-managed studies we aim to complete the consistency review within a maximum of 14 calendar days (excluding queries). As the rest of the process is managed by the applicant, we do not provide a timeline for this. You can see the timelines we are currently achieving on our main Radiation Assurance page. As we collect more data about the actual time taken for Radiation Assurance, timelines may adjust.

Feedback from both commercial and non-commercial sponsors has shown that they have benefited from a reduction in queries around consistency of radiation information and dose and risk calculations during the review process. They also report fewer queries at sites about the practical arrangements relating to radiation set-up, leading to quicker set-up times.

Still got questions?

Visit our FAQs page.

Back to radiation assurance