The approvals process for non-CTIMP modifications (amendments)

Last updated on 28 Apr 2026

Changes to all approved studies are no longer called 'amendments'. Instead, they are referred to as 'modifications'.

To familiarise yourself with the different type of modifications, we recommend you first read the update to 'amendment' terminology for non-CTIMPs guidance which details the changes.

We're designing and building a new digital service, Plan and Manage Health and Care Research, that will replace existing systems for planning, approving, setting up, managing and completing research. We introduced the new service to a small number of users in December 2025. We're using the term modifications for all study types in the new service.

The following sections outline the approvals process and timeframes from 28 April 2026 for modification requests, which will be reviewed by a Research Ethics Committee (REC).

The following guidance does not set out the processes and timelines for other reviews a modification may need, such as HRA and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) Approval.

Modification timeframe and process

Approvals process for non-CTIMP modifications
Long description

Categorising and submitting modifications

To submit a modification you first need to complete the Modification Tool and include the details of the trial and the proposed changes.

The tool categorises the modification based on the information you input, gives you guidance on which regulatory bodies (for example the REC, HRA) may need to review the modification and how you should submit it.

Substantial modification request validation

When a sponsor submits a substantial modification request, the REC checks to make sure it’s valid. We aim to communicate the outcome of the validation check within 1 working day of submission.

If the REC identifies any issues that prevent a substantial modification request from being considered valid, the sponsor will be asked to address these issues within 7 calendar days of when they submitted the substantial modification request.

If they cannot address these issues within 7 days, the REC categorises the substantial modification request as invalid. This means the sponsor needs to resubmit the substantial modification request, making sure they address the validation issues raised by the REC.

In all cases a substantial modification request is either confirmed as valid or invalid within 7 calendar days of the modification being submitted. The sponsor is notified via email to confirm if the substantial modification request is valid or invalid.

Once a substantial modification request is confirmed as valid, it is reviewed and an outcome is issued within 35 calendar days.

Initial review outcomes

There are 4 possible outcomes from the initial REC review of a substantial modification request. These are:

  • favourable opinion
  • favourable opinion subject to conditions
  • unable to issue a favourable opinion and requests further information
  • unfavourable opinion

Requests for further information

The REC may request further information when considering substantial modification requests.

This means that if the REC identifies issues that prevent a substantial modification request from being approved, the sponsor is informed of these issues and is able to respond before a final decision or opinion is issued. Requests for further information for substantial modifications are only issued in a minority of cases, where it’s not possible for the REC to give a favourable opinion or a favourable opinion with conditions.

If a request for further information is required, it is sent within 35 calendar days of the substantial modification request being confirmed as valid. If a sponsor receives a request for further information, they have a maximum of 60 calendar days to respond. A sponsor can respond at any point within the 60 day timeframe. If they do not respond within 60 days, the substantial modification request is not approved and is given an unfavourable opinion by the REC.

If the sponsor needs longer to prepare a response to the request for further information, they can request an extension from the REC.

They need to explain in their request why they need an extension and when they expect to respond.

Modified amendments

The introduction of the request for information process removes the option to submit a modified amendment following an unfavourable opinion.

The option to provide further detail to the REC will be provided before a final decision is given.

Modified amendments must not be submitted.

REC reviewing a response to a request for further information

Once the sponsor submits a response to a request for further information, the REC decides the outcome within a maximum of 10 calendar days. This is communicated via email.

There are 3 possible outcomes from the REC after they review a response to a request for further information. These are:

  • favourable opinion
  • favourable opinion subject to conditions
  • unfavourable opinion

If a substantial modification request is given an unfavourable opinion, the sponsor can appeal by emailing us at appeals@hra.nhs.uk within 28 calendar days of receiving the outcome. The sponsor needs to outline why they disagree with the outcome issued for the modification when they submit their appeal.

Clinical trials regulations guidance

For more information about the changes to CTIMPs, read our clinical trials regulations guidance.

Back to guidance on changes to non-ctimp clinical trials and other research