WiCS-LV Post Market Surveillance Registry
Research type
Research Study
Full title
WiCS-LV Post Market Surveillance Registry
IRAS ID
193993
Contact name
Christopher Rinaldi
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
EBR Systems Inc.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Duration of Study in the UK
5 years, 6 months, days
Research summary
Heart Failure is a serious condition in which the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's demands. Some heart failure occurs when the heart chambers pump in a desynchronised manner, reducing the amount of blood pumped with each heart beat.
NICE recommends Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) for a subset of these patients. Patients undergoing CRT receive a special implantable pacemaker or defibrillator with an additional lead (CS) to synchronise the pumping of the heart chambers (ventricles). CRT works by pacing both the left & right ventricles to ensure they pump at the same time. This in turn, reduces heart failure symptoms.
CRT is an effective treatment for many patients, but limitations prevent some patients from benefiting:
• 5 to 10% of patients fail to have the CS lead implanted
• 2 to 5% of patients have a chronic issue related the CS lead
• 30% of patients fail treatment
• 23% of patients have a complex upgrade from an existing pacemaker or ICDThe WiCS-LV System is an implantable pacing system capable of delivering pacing energy to the heart without using a pacing lead. It was designed to address the persistent limitations of current CRT systems. The WiCS-LV System operates alongside a co-implanted pacemaker, defibrillator or CRT system and replaces the pacing function of the CS lead.
The WiCS-LV System received CE Mark in September 2015. This Post Market Surveillance Registry is designed to collect performance data in normal conditions of use.
100 patients across Europe will be enrolled over an 18-month period and followed up for 5-years at intervals of 1-week, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, then annually.
Patients who have had a CS lead failure, received a CRT device and failed treatment, or require an upgrade to a CRT device would be invited.
REC name
London - Dulwich Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/LO/0194
Date of REC Opinion
12 Feb 2016
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion