What is the Personal Impact of Activity Pacing?

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    What is the Personal Impact of Activity Pacing? An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of People Living with Persistent Pain.

  • IRAS ID

    274696

  • Contact name

    Alan Bowman

  • Contact email

    A.Bowman@tees.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Teesside University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 4 months, 24 days

  • Research summary

    The purpose of the research is to understand the personal meaning and impact of activity pacing with individuals in persistent pain. Activity pacing is an intervention used to help modify activity levels in a structured way, aiming to improved functioning and reduce pain flare-ups. Current research into activity pacing is inconsistent; outcome studies are mixed, and patients report barriers to adopting activity pacing in their lives. Qualitative methods such as Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) have been identified as a useful approach to understanding why some people may respond well to an intervention, and others not. Andrews et al., (2015) used this approach pain patients in a tertiary care setting in order to develop a deep understanding of overactivity in people with persistent pain, and their experience of applying activity pacing strategies in their lives. The authors acknowledged that one of the shortcomings of this study was the relatively brief duration of the interviews, meaning that the depth of the findings of this study may be limited. The current study aims to address and build on the findings of Andrews et al. (2015) by a) using an innovative method of data collection (photo-elicitation), and b) conducting the investigation in a secondary care pain management setting, to broaden the knowledge gained from Andrews et al., (2015) which was conducted in a tertiary care setting. The study will investigate adults under the care of a secondary care pain management service, and participants are eligible if they have undertaken an activity pacing intervention in the last 12 months. Participants will be required to take photographs that they feel represent their experiences of activity pacing. These photographs will then form the basis of a semi-structured face-to-face interview, which will last approximately 60 minutes. The data will be analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis.

  • REC name

    North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/NE/0100

  • Date of REC Opinion

    28 Jul 2020

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion