What factors influence the optometric referral reply rate? - version 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    To identify what factors influence the optometric referral reply rate (RRR): a mixed methods study of communication between optometrists and medical professionals with regard to feedback on optometric referrals.

  • IRAS ID

    227869

  • Contact name

    Nicola Thomas

  • Contact email

    nicola.thomas@lsbu.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    London South Bank University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 4 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Community optometrists are primary eye care providers. Through the routine sight test, community optometrists identify patients with disease or ocular abnormalities that require referral for secondary medical care. Referral traditionally is accomplished via the General Ophthalmic Services 18 form, (GOS 18 form), or a letter. GOS 18 forms or letters are sent by post or delivered by the patient to the General Practitioner (GP), who typically forwards the form/letter to a local Hospital Eye Service (HES) clinic. GOS 18 forms or letters are sometimes posted or hand delivered directly to community ophthalmology clinics or HES clinics. Electronic transmission is becoming an increasingly common alternative approach. In most cases, the referring optometrist does not receive a reply to their referral. This has negative implications for financial, quality of care and professional development reasons. It is therefore desirable to improve the optometric referral reply rate (RRR).
    The proposed RRR study utilises mixed qualitative and quantitative methods. The first phase, of approximately 3 months duration, involves interviews of ophthalmic/medical, academic, administrative and private patient/public stakeholders (representing participant involvement in the study design). This will be followed by an explanatory sequential mixed methods design with quantitative documentary analysis of two years' referral letters and referral reply letters from a representative sample of three optometric practice modalities: corporate body (example: Specsavers, Vision Express), independently owned optometric practice and domiciliary). This phase will take approximately ten months. A final qualitative phase of stakeholder interviews (approximately three months) will explore in detail the quantitative findings of the documentary analysis. The desired outcome of the investigation is an improved understanding of factors that influence the low referral reply rate. Recommendations that foster a more collaborative working environment will be proposed. It is anticipated that this will improve overall NHS ophthalmic service provision.

  • REC name

    London - Surrey Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/1886

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 Jan 2018

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion