Values Based Reflective Practice study V1
Research type
Research Study
Full title
"An evaluation in the use of Values Based Reflective Practice groups as a method of providing support and resilience to staff who have been involved in Adverse Events"
IRAS ID
179058
Contact name
Bernadette Cassidy
Sponsor organisation
Queen Margaret University
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 3 months, 11 days
Research summary
10% of all hospitalised patients in the UK will receive an error in their care, which is defined as being the failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or the use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim, in their treatment. (Milligan 2006)
Following the publication of the Francis Report (2013) and the Berwick Report (2013), the major shift is from a " blame" culture to that of a " No-blame" or a "Just" culture where errors are reported; responsibility taken and lessons learnt resulting in a reduction in errors.
However, being involved in adverse events can have serious detrimental impact on staff; affecting their health, causing emotional distress and performance in the workplace, symptoms that are characteristic of Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome becoming the Second Victim . (Wu2000) Therefore support systems not only need to be established but need to be widely communicated so that staff are aware of available resources, are receptive to accepting help, and know how to access assistance.
This research intends to evaluate the use of peer support in the form of Values Based Reflective Practice(VBRP®). This is a model of reflecting on practice within the context of professional and personal values leading to reduced stress and absenteeism. VBRP is not a form of Critical Debriefing but it may offer support to allow staff to have the confidence to report adverse events whereby improving patient safety and reduce the risk of them becoming a Second Victim.
The research consists of working with 2 participant groups:
I. All the clinical staff in Tayside Cancer Centre. This group will receive the short open-ended questionnaire.
II. 8 clinical staff working at advance practice level. This group will be participants of the VBRP® group.REC name
East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 1
REC reference
15/ES/0116
Date of REC Opinion
19 Oct 2015
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion