VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETER WITH ASSISTED/UNASSISTED MOVEMENT.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    CRITERION VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE ACTIGRAPH(TM) GT3X ACCELEROMETER IN MEASUREMENT OF BODY POSITION, POSTURAL TRANSITION AND WALKING WITH AND WITHOUT ASSISTANCE: A FEASIBILITY STUDY.

  • IRAS ID

    147297

  • Contact name

    Jayne L Anderson

  • Contact email

    jayne.anderson@hey.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Research summary

    Can the Actigraph GT3X accelerometer (movement sensor) reliably identify and accurately record functional movements (i.e. involving combinations of lying, sitting, standing and stepping) as typically undertaken by hospital inpatients recovering from critical illness?

    Little is known about the regularity of activity undertaken by patients recovering from critical illness in hospital, other than that directly observed and documented by hospital staff.

    If this accelerometer model can accurately and reliably record the functional movements typically undertaken by this patient population, it could be used to identify the patterns of activity that patients undertake and if lengthy periods of inactivity occur at similar times during the day. Prolonged inactivity could impact on speed of physical recovery and the likelihood of developing further complications (e.g. Deep Vein Thrombosis and chest infection).

    Thirty healthy adult volunteers, wearing comfortable clothing and committing one and a half hours of their time, will wear two accelerometers, one around the ankle and another over the hip to determine if a single site is superior when investigating agreement between accelerometry output and a criterion measure (observation using video recording). Participants will perform and repeat a set of predetermined movement sequences - lying to sitting, sitting to standing and walking a ten metre distance, both independently and with assistance, undertaking instruction on how to simulate someone who is weakened.

    Accelerometer output will be compared against time matched frames of the video recording to determine agreement in identification of body position (i.e. lying, sitting or standing). By comparing these two sources we aim to determine whether the accelerometer output can identify the actual movement being undertaken (e.g. sitting to standing), the time it took place and its duration. It will take place within a simulated ward environment within the chief investigators hospital. Data collection is planned to last one month.

  • REC name

    HSC REC B

  • REC reference

    14/NI/1023

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Jun 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion