Validation of the Paediatric Anaesthesia Behaviour Score in PACU

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Validation of the Paediatric Anaesthesia Behaviour Score in the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit following General Anaesthesia for Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

  • IRAS ID

    217927

  • Contact name

    RICHARD BERINGER

  • Contact email

    richard.beringer@uhbristol.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 5 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Children wake from a general anaesthetic in the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit. How a child wakes is extremely variable: some children wake up calm and happy; many are agitated and upset; and at the extreme end of the spectrum, some children exhibit behaviour known as emergence delirium (ED).

    ED may require additional staff assistance or even pharmacological intervention to prevent self-injury, disruption to surgical repair, accidental removal of IV cannula, catheters and drains.

    ED can be distressing for parents and staff and may cause parental dissatisfaction with their child’s care. The long term psychological consequences of ED are still unclear, but children who show agitation during emergence have a higher risk of developing negative post-operative behaviours including separation anxiety, enuresis, apathy, sleep and eating disorders and temper tantrums.

    The Paediatric Anaesthesia Behaviour (PAB) score was developed in Bristol Royal Hospital for children and has been validated during induction of anaesthesia, and is a simple tool for identification of behavioural disturbance.

    The purpose of this study is to validate this simple tool so that it can be used for all children undergoing general anaesthesia. This is the first step of a quality improvement project with the aim of reducing the incidence and severity of emergence delirium.

  • REC name

    London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/LO/2088

  • Date of REC Opinion

    15 Nov 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion