Validation of a scale of GPs’ reassurance during LBP consultations

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Validation of a scale to measure GPs’ use of reassurance during low back pain consultations

  • IRAS ID

    118558

  • Contact name

    Nicola A Holt

  • Contact email

    ztjt128@live.rhul.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Royal Holloway, University of London

  • Research summary

    Reassurance is indicated in many guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP) in primary care, but how to effectively reassure patients is poorly defined and researched. Coia & Morley (1998) suggest a distinction between cognitive (information-based) and affective (emotional) reassurance, and that patients may experience different outcomes depending on the type of reassurance they receive. We have developed a questionnaire to measure patients’ perceptions of reassurance during LBP consultations according to this distinction. The current study will obtain LBP patients’ responses to the questionnaire in order to assess whether it is reliable and accurately measures the process of reassurance during consultations with general practitioners (GPs). Patients will be recruited from GP surgeries in Surrey and Northampton, and will be asked to fill in the questionnaire along with some information about themselves, their LBP, and their overall experience of the consultation. Recruitment will last for 3-6 months in order to gain a large and representative sample of LBP patients. Statistical analysis will allow the researchers to see whether the questionnaire produces consistent results which accurately represent LBP patients’ perceptions of reassurance from GPs. The result will be a validated questionnaire, which can be used in future research to assess whether different types of reassurance do indeed lead to different outcomes for LBP patients.

    Coia, P., Morley, S. Medical reassurance and patients’ responses. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1998, 45(5), 377-386.

  • REC name

    London - City & East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/LO/0817

  • Date of REC Opinion

    20 May 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion