Validating the Critical Care Functional Rehabilitation Outcome Measure

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The Critical Care Functional Rehabilitation Outcome Measure - A validation study

  • IRAS ID

    188232

  • Contact name

    Paul Twose

  • Contact email

    Paul.twose@wales.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 5 months, 3 days

  • Research summary

    Patients that become very poorly need treatment in a critical care unit (also known as intensive care unit). During this time they may be attached to a breathing machine (ventilator) and may also be given medications to make them sleep whilst their body recovers. Following their illness, these patients are often weak and are unable to complete their normal daily tasks (e.g. getting out of bed, sitting or standing).

    Physiotherapists are involved in aiding patients to recover from this weakness by providing rehabilitation. This is started in critical care and continues when the patient is transferred to a ward. Sometimes this recovery process may be relatively quick (days to weeks) whereas it may take much longer if a patient has been very unwell (weeks to months).

    To help recognise how a patient is progressing, physiotherapists often use tests or scales, known as ‘outcome measures’. Outcome measures help the physiotherapist to demonstrate whether a treatment is being effective. To aid this process, physiotherapists must ensure that the outcome measure being used is appropriate (valid) and that it can be accurately repeated on several occasions (reliable).

    Previous research by the chief invesigator developed an outcome measure which was shown to be both valid and reliable. However, this research only involved a low number of participants and therefore further research is required to confirm the appropriateness of the tool and to ensure its reliability.

  • REC name

    Wales REC 3

  • REC reference

    16/WA/0005

  • Date of REC Opinion

    15 Jan 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion