Using games as neuropsychological tests with children with ABI (V1)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Investigating the use of board games as neuropsychological tests with children with acquired brain injury.

  • IRAS ID

    199174

  • Contact name

    Patrick Murphy

  • Contact email

    u1438315@uel.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of East london

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 9 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Neuropsychological tests are used with children and young people (CYP) with acquired brain injury (ABI) to estimate cognitive functioning. However, the controlled conditions these tests are administered under makes it difficult to predict everyday functioning from results. These test conditions also create anxiety, which reduces test validity and makes it difficult to foster a relationship with CYP in rehabilitation.
    This study examines whether:

    (i) Structured versions of Guess Who? and Connect 4 provide estimates of cognitive functioning similar to established neuropsychological tests.

    (ii) Scores on these games are predictive of “real-world” difficulties as rated by caregivers and therapists.

    (iii) These games provoke less anxiety and oppositional behaviour for CYP with ABI when compared with traditional neuropsychological tests.

    Participants with ABI will be recruited from a service in London providing inpatient and outpatient care and rehabilitation for CYP with ABI 18 years and under. CYP under 8 years or with severe impairments (whether pre- or post-injury) will not be recruited. Additionally, healthy participants will be recruited from schools in the London area.

    Participants will be recruited for nine months until February 2017.

    All participants will complete 6 games each of Guess Who? and Connect 4. They will also complete established measures of cognitive function. Participants will complete ratings scales of anxiety after completing the games and tests. Caregivers and therapeutic staff will complete "proxy measures" that describe the participants’ everyday functioning.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/WM/0331

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Sep 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion