UNITE-VT
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Using Non-Invasive mapping To Eliminate structural heart disease Ventricular Tachycardia: a UK Randomised Controlled Trial
IRAS ID
366199
Contact name
Tarvinder Dhanjal
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of Warwick
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 11 months, 29 days
Research summary
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an abnormal and dangerous heart rhythm affecting the lower chambers of the heart (the ventricles). Patients with structural heart disease caused by previous heart attacks are at an increased risk of developing VT. Current guidelines recommend that patients who develop this abnormal heart rhythm are considered for invasive catheter ablation (ICA). This is an invasive procedure where specialised catheters and a 3D electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) system are used to identify the region of the heart responsible for the VT, which is then treated by tissue heating or freezing (ablation). Although significant improvements have been made in both mapping and ablation technologies, these procedures remain technically challenging and time consuming.
View into ventricular onset (VIVO, Catheter Precision) is a non-invasive, mapping system already being used within the NHS. It uses images from previous heart scans, a picture of the patient’s chest (taken at the start of the procedure) and a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) tracing, to locate where the VT is coming from. The VIVO map can therefore highlight the likely region of interest for ICA prior to invasive EAM.
This study will be a prospective, multi-centre, two-arm, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT). Patients will be evenly randomised (50:50) into a standard VT ablation group and a VIVO guided ablation group. In the VIVO guided ablation group, invasive EAM will be restricted to the region of interest identified using the VIVO map, rather than whole chamber mapping required for standard ablation. The primary objective will be to determine if the VIVO non-invasive mapping system reduces procedure duration and therefore improves workflow efficiency. Secondary objectives will assess the procedural success, safety and patient perceived health benefits of a VIVO guided ablation versus standard ablation.REC name
Yorkshire & The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
26/YH/0045
Date of REC Opinion
8 Apr 2026
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion