TRITON Trial v1.0

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    TReatment of Irritable bowel syndrome using Titrated ONdansetron Trial

  • IRAS ID

    219133

  • Contact name

    Robin Charles Spiller

  • Contact email

    robin.spiller@nottingham.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Eudract number

    2017-000533-31

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 7 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Research Summary

    Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a common condition characterised by recurrent abdominal pain with frequent, loose stools passed with urgency. Such patients may have an excess of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT)) in their intestine which stimulates movement through the bowel (transit) and secretion. Ondansetron is a drug which blocks the 5-HT receptor, which is used to treat nausea, and has an excellent safety record. We have encouraging pilot data that Ondansetron slows transit and improves IBS-D symptoms. We now wish to find out how it work . We will measure bowel contractions using a new high resolution system and bowel relaxation by assessing pressure during rectal distension with a balloon to determine whether these changes are related to improved symptoms. We will also measure total bile acid concentrations and the amount of pancreatic enzyme, tryptase, in the stools as these may sensitise the rectum causing urgency. The response to ondansetron may depend upon genetic factors so we will assess the variation in the gene controlling the rate of 5HT production. We will perform a trial in which we treat patients with Ondansetron or a placebo (a dummy tablet without any effect) and compare the change in symptoms. After confirming the diagnosis patients will be randomly assigned to take either Ondansetron or placebo for 12 weeks while recording symptoms. Neither the patient nor the study team will know which treatment the patient receives until the end of the trial to avoid any bias. We will repeat our measurements in the 12th week to see the effect of the drug compared to placebo. The study will confirm if Ondansetron works in IBS, improve our ability to predict who will respond to Ondansetron and exactly how it works, so newer better drugs can be developed for this common but poorly understood condition.

    Summary of Results

    Background: Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is characterised by frequent, loose, or watery stools with marked reduction of quality of life. Pilot data suggests ondansetron benefits patients with IBS-D.
    Methods: A randomised clinical trial in 80 patients meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS-D from 18 centres throughout the UK. Patients received either ondansetron or placebo for 12 weeks but their allocation was concealed from both investigator and patient. They recorded their worst abdominal pain, stool frequency and consistency daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients meeting the FDA criteria for being a “responder” meaning they showed benefit to both pain and days with loose stool. Secondary endpoints included pain intensity, stool consistency, frequency,. We also measured the time for content to pass through the gut (whole gut transit time [WGTT]).
    Results: Mean (95% CI) The study closed early due to slow recruitment with just 80 patients randomised. There were 40.5 % of “responders” in the ondansetron arm and 27.9 % in the placebo arm however due to low numbers these differences could be due to chance. There was a significant difference in average stool consistency in the final month of treatment. WGTT increased significantly more on ondansetron, increasing from baseline to 12 weeks by a mean of by 3.8 hours while it fell 2.2 hours on placebo.
    Conclusion –These results are consistent with previous studies showing ondansetron improves stool consistency and slows transit. However being underpowered the apparent improvement in responder rate could have been due to chance. A further larger trial is needed to confirm the benefit of ondansetron which should be done in primary care where most patients are to be found.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/YH/0262

  • Date of REC Opinion

    7 Nov 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion