The views and experiences of Lanarkshire GPs' on approaching
Research type
Research Study
Full title
“The views and experiences of Lanarkshire GPs’ on approaching the subject of adult overweight and obesity during consultation”
IRAS ID
152315
Contact name
Angela Bonar
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of The West of Scotland
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 8 months, 5 days
Research summary
Obesity has now become a global problem in both developed and developing countries, leading to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure), hypercholesterolemia (increased cholesterol levels in the blood), asthma, arthritis and some cancers. It is estimated that the cost of treating adult obesity in the UK has reached £6 billion, which is significantly more than treating other major illnesses caused by alcohol or smoking alone. Scotland now has one of the highest levels of obesity in Europe, with over one million adults now being classified as obese. This is predicted to worsen with adult obesity levels reaching 40% by 2030. Current research has indicated that although primary care providers (General Medical Practitioners) are very often the first point of contact for many healthcare needs, negative attitudes from General Medical Practitioners (GP's) in relation to overweight and obesity has resulted in some patients reporting very negative experiences in achieving any long-term changes in their lifestyle. It is noted from the literature that some studies have provided insightful qualitative and quantitative data around GP's views of treating overweight and obesity. There is however a knowledge gap in relation to how GP's approach this sensitive subject during a consultation period, particularly if weight was not the primary reason for attending the GP. Research in the UK has highlighted some evidence indicating that GP's do not believe that approaching the subject of overweight or obesity falls within their professional domain. Therefore, identifying approach strategies and understanding barriers are important if we are to support the promotion of these important conversations.
REC name
East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
14/EM/1294
Date of REC Opinion
18 Dec 2014
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion