The use of locum doctors in the NHS

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The use of locum doctors in the NHS: understanding and improving the safety and quality of care

  • IRAS ID

    278888

  • Contact name

    Kieran Walshe

  • Contact email

    kieran.walshe@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Manchester

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    N/A, N/A

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    The aim of this NIHR funded research is to provide evidence on the extent, quality and safety of medical locum practice and the implications of medical locum working for health service organisation and delivery in primary and secondary care in the English NHS. The use of locum doctors in the NHS has grown rapidly over the last decade, and there have been widespread and sustained concerns about the quality/safety, cost and effective use of locum doctors. There is little prior research on locum practice/performance to confirm those concerns or to inform the development of working arrangements for locums which will assure safety and the quality of care.
    The study will run for two years and will address three main research questions:
    • What is the nature, scale and scope of locum doctor working in the NHS in England?
    • How may locum doctor working arrangements affect patient safety and the quality of care?
    • How do the clinical practice and performance of locum and permanent doctors compare?

    Our mixed methods study will find out where locum doctors work in the NHS in England, what kinds of work they do, and how the use of locum doctors is organised. This is a mixed methods study, combining the use of a national survey of NHS organisations, in-depth qualitative research in four case study organisations including interviews with locums and other healthcare staff, focus groups with patient groups and observations of meeting relating to locum working, and quantitative analysis of existing routine data sets to address these questions in both primary and secondary care.

  • REC name

    North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/NW/0386

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Oct 2020

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion