The feasibility of online Shared Reading for gynaecological cancers
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Turning the Page: Evaluating the feasibility of online Shared Reading (oSR) for gynaecological cancers
IRAS ID
348294
Contact name
Sonia Tomescu-Stachie
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of Southampton
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 10 months, 30 days
Research summary
Gynaecological cancers significantly impact physical, emotional, and social wellbeing (Carter et al., 2013; Huffman et al., 2016). While traditional psychological interventions such as CBT and mindfulness remain essential, there is increasing recognition of the need for creative, complementary approaches to support wellbeing (Puetz et al., 2013; Reynolds & Prior, 2006). This need is further underscored by long NHS waiting lists exceeding 18 weeks (Cavallaro & Tallack, 2025). Emerging research highlights the potential of creative arts interventions, which have been linked to improved emotional expression, social connectedness, and psychological resilience (Fraser et al., 2014; Mundet-Bolos et al., 2017; Fancourt & Finn, 2019). One such approach is Shared Reading (SR), a literature-based intervention that fosters emotional engagement and community through group reading of poetry, short stories, or novels. Developed by the UK charity The Reader, SR typically involves small groups (2–12 participants) led by trained Reader Leaders (RLs) who facilitate discussions in a supportive, non-clinical setting such as libraries or community centres (Billington et al., 2016; Davies et al., 2012). SR has been explored in prisons, dementia care, substance abuse recovery, and mental health services, showing promising effects on wellbeing and social connection (Bavishi et al., 2016; Billington et al., 2010, 2013, 2016; Dowrick et al., 2012). However, research on SR within oncology settings remains limited. Existing studies have been hindered by a lack of feasibility evaluations (Carnwath & Brown, 2014; Daykin, 2019) and an over-reliance on either quantitative or qualitative methodologies alone rather than mixed-methods approaches (Cameron et al., 2013; Clift, 2012).
This study aims to bridge these gaps by evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of an online Shared Reading (oSR) intervention for women with gynaecological cancer. Findings may provide valuable insights for future intervention development and inform recommendations for psychosocial support within healthcare settings, both in the UK and internationally.
REC name
London - South East Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
25/PR/0739
Date of REC Opinion
24 Jun 2025
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion