TCPO2 Improvements following revascularisation intervention

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Does Transcutaneous Pressure of Oxygen (TcpO2) improve following intervention (bypass or stent) in patients with occlusive peripheral arterial disease?

  • IRAS ID

    252558

  • Contact name

    Harriet Robinson

  • Contact email

    harriet.robinson@nbt.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Newcastle University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 12 days

  • Research summary

    Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the narrowing of arteries (most commonly in the legs) due to the build up of plaque. This can lead to a reduced blood supply to the feet and the development of non-healing wounds and rest pain. These patients are often offered surgical intervention, to improve blood supply, by two methods:
    - Bypass graft surgery: a portion of the patient’s own vein or a prosthetic graft is used to bypass the diseased portion of the artery, providing a “diversion” of blood flow around the narrowing or blockage.
    - Angioplasty & stenting: a small wire with a balloon on the end is inserted into the diseased artery and inflated to stretch out the narrowing. In some cases a stent is placed into the artery permanently after stretching to hold it open.

    Transcutaneous Pressure of Oxygen (TcpO2) is a measure of how well oxygen from the blood is delivered to the tissue, and can be used to quantify how bad a patient’s PAD is and used as an indicator for wound healing.
    In patients with occlusive PAD you would expect a reduced TcpO2 measurement due to the reduced blood supply. We will be looking at whether there is a post-operative improvement in this measurement, and whether there is a comparison in improvements between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. It may then be possible to use TcpO2 as a measure of success of revascularisation, using the measurements alongside ultrasound scanning to evaluate patient outcomes.

  • REC name

    South Central - Oxford B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/SC/0167

  • Date of REC Opinion

    8 Apr 2019

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion