Tai chi for stroke survivors

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Exploring tai chi as an early intervention to improve balance and reduce falls among stroke survivors - a feasibility study.

  • IRAS ID

    171300

  • Contact name

    Elizabeth Harkin

  • Contact email

    elizabeth.harkin2@midyorks.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Huddersfield

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 6 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    There has been a considerable increase in re-admission to hospital as a result of falls, placing a huge economic burden on the NHS (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE], 2013). People with stroke require rehabilitation to improve their functional mobility and are often referred to community therapy services. However, this rehabilitation stops once the patient has reached their full potential. This is usually before 6 months, the period during which the patient is most at risk of falling.

    Physiotherapy for stroke survivors has been recommended by NICE for at least 45 minutes, 5 times a week. However, this includes travel and paperwork, leaving little time for rehabilitation. Self-practice at home could be an effective supplement to achieve this recommendation. Effective exercise programmes in the community are lacking (Department of Health, 2008).

    According to the Department of Health (2010), exercise is required in order to prevent a first fall, and that this exercise could be tai chi.

    It is unknown if tai chi would be acceptable amongst stroke survivors in the UK. Therefore, I propose a feasibility study using a modified tai chi programme with home-practice for stroke survivors in the early rehabilitation phase, in order to evaluate its acceptance, compliance and adherence, as well as recruitment rates. In addition, the acceptable dose of tai chi, power calculation and suitability of outcome measures will be assessed.

  • REC name

    London - Stanmore Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/LO/2037

  • Date of REC Opinion

    14 Dec 2015

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion