Surgeon versus anaethetist inserted rectus sheath catheters: an RCT
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Surgical Placement versus Anaesthetic placement of Rectus sheath Catheter for pain relief following major abdominal surgery (SPARC). A Single Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
IRAS ID
222025
Contact name
Dale Vimalachandran
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 0 months, 1 days
Research summary
Pain management post laparotomy (abdominal surgery) can be difficult and in our trust we are increasingly using rectus sheath catheters.This is achieved by placing catheters, done by either by the surgeon or anaesthetist into the potential space between the rectus muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Two catheters are placed, one on either side of the mid-line wound. Local anaesthetic is then infused through the catheters for up to 3 days post-operatively. This provides analgesia to the central abdominal wall in the region of the T7-T11 dermatomes. It only provides analgesia for somatic pain, not visceral pain and hence needs to be used in addition to a multi-modal analgesic regime usually including a patient controlled analgesia device (PCA) containing either morphine or oxycodone. Advantages of a RSC infusion over an epidural include that it can be used in patients with coagulopathy or systemic infection and can be safely performed asleep. It is also less labour intensive to manage on the ward and does not carry the same risks of hypotension and excessive fluid administration that are associated with an epidural.
There is randomised controlled trial evidence that RSC infusions in addition to PCA provide superior analgesia when compared to PCA alone in surgery performed through a midline incision. There is also a randomised controlled trial in progress that is comparing analgesic quality of epidural infusions to RSC with PCA. In most published literature to date, RSC are inserted by the anaesthetist using ultrasound to aid placement. In our hospital, some RSC are inserted by anaesthetists although the majority are performed by surgeons at the end of an operation. This is because we believe that this technique is less time consuming and both insertion techniques result in equivalent analgesia.
The primary aim endpoint of this study is to determine any difference in insertion time for rectus sheath catheters between those inserted by surgeons and those inserted by anaesthetists. Observationally in our hospital, there is no difference in quality of analgesia provided by the two insertion techniques. However, surgical insertion of RSC causes less disruption of an operation as the patient already has their abdomen draped with sterilised skin as part of their surgical procedure. Also, surgical insertion of RSC with an open abdomen is potentially easier than ultrasound guided insertion by an anaesthetist before an operation.REC name
North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
17/NW/0403
Date of REC Opinion
24 Aug 2017
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion