Spironolactone with Patiromer in the Treatment of Resistant HTN in CKD

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo controlled, Parallel Group Study of Patiromer for the Enablement of Spironolactone Use for Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Resistant Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy (AMBER)

  • IRAS ID

    222279

  • Contact name

    Elaine Lee

  • Contact email

    elee@relypsa.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Relypsa Inc.

  • Eudract number

    2016-002657-38

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 10 months, 5 days

  • Research summary

    The study aims to evaluate patiromer treatment with spironolactone in subjects with resistant hypertension and CKD. The study will evaluate whether using patiromer with spironolactone will allow more persistent use of spironolactone by preventing high blood potassium. It is anticipated that more persistent use of spironolactone will result in better blood pressure control. Spironolactone is a medication that has been effective in addition to other medications for the treatment of resistant hypertension (high BP that is difficult to treat with 3 medicatons) but it not used in patients with CKD because of the risk of causing high blood potassium (hyperkalemia).
    The study will consist of a Screening/Run-in Period (up to 4 weeks), a 12-week Double-Blind Treatment Phase and a Follow-up Visit 2 weeks after Week 12 or ET Visit.
    All subjects in this study will receive spironolactone. Approximately half of the subjects will be receiving patiromer and the other half will be receiving placebo (a substance that does not contain any medicine). Subjects will not be told when are receiving patiromer or when are receiving placebo. Subjects may be told about treatment assignment (patiromer or placebo) after all study participants have completed the study and all unblinded study findings have been determined by Relypsa, Inc.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Derby Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/EM/0055

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 Apr 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion