Sexual assault survivors and cervical smears

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Identifying factors that facilitate sexual assault survivors to attend their cervical smear

  • IRAS ID

    224330

  • Contact name

    Katherine Madden

  • Contact email

    katherine.madden.2015@rhul.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Royal Holloway

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 4 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Sexual assault describes unwanted sexual abuse/activity which can involve force and lead to distress (APA, 2016). Women who have been sexual assaulted are significantly less likely to attend cervical smears (Farley et al., 2002) and previous research has identified barriers to attendance (Cadman et al., 2012) but not individualistic factors that facilitate attendance. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), a health behaviour model, has been applied to explain and predict intention and attendance to a range of health behaviours, including cervical smears in a typical female population (Luszczynska et al., 2011) however has not been applied to look at why women who have been sexually assaulted do or don’t attend their smear. This project aims to use constructs of the HAPA approach to explain what factors facilitate intention and on going attendance of cervical smear tests in women who have been sexually assaulted.
    Fourty-four women aged 25-65 years with a range of cervical smears attendance history will be recruited. A questionnaire design will be used to look at whether constructs included in the HAPA model can explain intention or attendance to smear tests, above and beyond other possible variables known to also influence intention or attendance.
    Multinomial regression will be used to analyse the amount of variance explained by variables in the HAPA model. This is with the aim of informing interventions to support women who avoid cervical smear attendance.

  • REC name

    London - South East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/0790

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 May 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion