SAM-I Feasibility Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Safe Administration of Medicines Intervention (SAM-I): feasibility study of an intervention to de-implement unnecessary double checking of medicines in hospital

  • IRAS ID

    367872

  • Contact name

    Beth Fylan

  • Contact email

    B.Fylan@bradford.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 6 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Medication administration errors (MAEs) are a major source of avoidable harm in NHS hospitals, with over half of medication errors occurring during administration. Double-checking is widely embedded in local medicines policies to reduce errors; however, evidence of effectiveness is limited, and the practice may introduce unintended harms, including delays to time-critical medicines and increased workload for nurses

    This study (Work Package 3 of the SaSI-MEDs NIHR Programme Grant) is a non-randomised, service-level feasibility study evaluating a co-designed de-implementation intervention aimed at reducing routine double-checking and supporting safe single-checking of medicines. The study will be conducted across three NHS Trusts and six inpatient services using a staggered before-and-after design.

    The intervention includes local policy change (removal of routine double-signature requirements), staff training in safe single-checking, leadership endorsement, workflow supports, and ward-level champions. Feasibility will be assessed through direct observation of medication administration, nurse questionnaires (attitudes to single-checking and care left undone), and routinely collected data on medication delays, errors, patient safety incidents and length of patient stays.

    Qualitative research will explore feasibility, acceptability, and organisational readiness for change. Observations, semi-structured interviews and focus grouplets with frontline nurses and ward leaders will examine how the intervention works in practice, contextual barriers and facilitators, informal adaptations, and conditions required for safe de-implementation.

    Findings will refine the intervention, confirm outcome measures, and determine readiness criteria ahead of a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

  • REC name

    London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    26/LO/0402

  • Date of REC Opinion

    8 Jun 2026

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion