Safety & Tolerability of PC945 in healthy & subjects with mild asthma

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, study to assess the safety and tolerability of single escalating and repeat, inhaled doses of PC945 in healthy subjects combined with a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group to assess the safety and tolerability of a single dose of inhaled PC945 in subjects with mild asthma.

  • IRAS ID

    197504

  • Contact name

    Muna Albayaty

  • Contact email

    muna.albayaty@parexel.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Pulmocide Ltd

  • Eudract number

    2015-003327-64

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02715570

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 3 months, 25 days

  • Research summary

    The new medicine tested in this study is called PC945. The Sponsor is developing the study medicine for treating long term (chronic) infections in the lungs caused by fungi, particularly those caused by aspergillus, a particular type of fungus. This type of infection is called aspergillosis and it can leave patients with widespread lung damage that cannot be cured.\nThe main purpose of the study is to find out if the study medicine has any important side effects in both healthy participants and participants with mild asthma. The study also investigates how much of the study medicine gets into the bloodstream when given at different doses, how quickly the body gets rids of it and whether it has an effect on breathing or any naturally occurring fungi that lives in your airway.\nVital signs, safety electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements, safety laboratory assessments, lung function tests, pharyngeal (throat swabs) and sublingual (fluid from the mouth) sample collection, physical examinations, adverse events and concomitant medications will be monitored throughout the entire investigational period. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis will be collected.\n

  • REC name

    South Central - Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/SC/0027

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Mar 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion