Safety & Efficacy of 2 Alternative Forms of Oral Buprenorphine (v10)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A PHASE II, RANDOMISED, SINGLE CENTRE, OPEN-LABEL, TWO-ARM STUDY TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BUPRENORPHINE ORAL LYOPHILISATE (XPRENOR ®) IN COMPARISON WITH BUPRENORPHINE SUBLINGUAL TABLETS (SUBUTEX®)IN OPIOID-DEPENDENT PATIENTS

  • IRAS ID

    114096

  • Contact name

    John Strang

  • Sponsor organisation

    Macarthys Laboratories t/a Martindale Pharma

  • Eudract number

    2012-003560-49

  • ISRCTN Number

    No number provided

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    No number provided

  • Research summary

    This study is designed to determine the safety and efficacy of a new oral wafer form of buprenorphine (Xprenor)at clinically effective doses compared with sublingual buprenorphine tablets (Subutex) in opioid-dependent patients. Xprenor has been specifically developed to provide clinicians and patients with a formulation of Opioid Substitution Therapy which will reduce the risks of diversion and abuse but will continue to provide an effective treatment. It is a single centre, 2-arm, open-label study to be undertaken at a nationally recognised centre. The study will comprise screening, pre-randomisation treatment, titration to an effective dose, maintenance at that dose and extension back to a conventional treatment. Safety will be monitored by measuring blood oxygen levels and respiration rate during Titration and at end of the Maintenance Periods, adverse events (AEs)s will be monitored throughout the study. Efficacy will be evaluated by in-patient reported opioid withdrawal symptoms from baseline to end of study between Subutex and Xprenor using assessment scales. Blood drug concentrations will be measured at selected times during the study. The time required for test medication disintegration / complete disappearance will also be measured.

  • REC name

    London - Brent Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    12/LO/1490

  • Date of REC Opinion

    2 Oct 2012

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion