S-REF and suicidal ideation ESM

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An experience sampling study of self-regulatory executive function and suicidal ideation

  • IRAS ID

    193046

  • Contact name

    Daniel Pratt

  • Contact email

    daniel.pratt@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Research Governance Support Office, University of Manchester, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 7 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Can we better understand what leads people to consider suicide by looking at how people understand their own thoughts?

    Suicide has a devastating impact on families and communities. If we know what leads people to consider suicide, we’ll be better placed to help individuals who are struggling. Research is now saying that the beliefs people hold about their thoughts might be just as important in understanding someone’s distress as the content of the thoughts themselves. This is particularly true if those beliefs lead people to try to control their thoughts using counter-productive strategies. Although this knowledge has meant that people who are experiencing anxiety and depression can now get more effective treatment, no-one yet has tested whether it might also help us to understand what drives someone to think about suicide. That is the aim of this study.

    In order to achieve its aim, this study will recruit adults (18+) who have experienced thoughts about suicide within the previous 2 months. The sample will be sought from in-patient, crisis and community mental health services in Cumbria, and Lancashire Women’s Centre. Participants will be asked to meet with a researcher and fill in some questionnaires. After that, they will be asked to complete a short questionnaire online using a mobile smartphone. This should be completed regularly (up to seven times/day) for 6 days.

  • REC name

    North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/NW/0094

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Mar 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion