Retained Placenta Study: Part I

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Retained Placenta: Factors and outcomes associated with various forms. A retrospective cohort study of women to explore factors and outcomes associated with various forms of retained placenta which occurred at Liverpool Women's Hospital during the period 2009-2014

  • IRAS ID

    171505

  • Contact name

    Andrew Weeks

  • Contact email

    aweeks@liv.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    The University of Liverpool

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    In the UK, a placenta is considered retained if is not delivered within 30 minutes of active management and 60 minutes of expectant management of the third stage of labour (NICE, 2014). If a retained placenta (RP) is not treated, it may lead to maternal death due to postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss) or sepsis. Currently, its standard treatment is manual removal of placenta. This is associated with anaesthetic and surgical risks compared to medical alternatives. Unfortunately these medical alternatives are not well investigated. This is partly because of current inability to rapidly and accurately diagnose the various forms of retained placenta prior to theatre on the labour ward. This study (The Retained Placenta study) will seek to determine whether the types of RP can be diagnosed prior to surgery and whether the type is important.

    Initially it is important to determine whether the three types of retained placenta are distinct clinical entities – do they differ in pathology only, or are the aetiological factors (causes) and outcomes also different? This will be achieved in this phase of the study.

    Indeed, researchers have described many factors and outcomes associated with the retained placenta; but they are not specified according to its various forms.

    Hence, a retrospective cohort study of Liverpool women is proposed to examine the factors and outcomes associated with the various forms of retained placenta from 2009 to 2014. The data for this is already collected at the Liverpool Women’s Hospital from women that delivered there that time and had retained placenta (Study Group) and did not have retained placenta (Control Group). This study is simply to analyse those data.

  • REC name

    East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 2

  • REC reference

    15/ES/0069

  • Date of REC Opinion

    29 May 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion