RECOLLECT

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Recovery College Characterisation and Testing

  • IRAS ID

    211925

  • Contact name

    Mike Slade

  • Contact email

    m.slade@nottingham.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 5 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Mental health services provide treatments (e.g. medicine, talking therapy)
    to people with mental health problems. Treatments often reduce, but do
    not completely cure, the problems, meaning that many people live with
    mental health problems long-term. Support involves helping people to live
    well even when they have ongoing symptoms.
    Recovery Colleges are a new approach to supporting people living with
    mental health problems. They are collaborative, strengths-based, personcentred,
    inclusive (i.e. available to all) and community-focused. A Recovery
    College provides support to students (mainly mental health service users
    but also family members, staff and other stakeholders) through adult
    education rather than through medical treatments. Service users are not
    referred by clinicians but enrol themselves, develop an Individual Learning
    Plan and then choose courses relevant to their learning goals. Professional
    experts and people with personal experience of mental health problems
    co-produce the curriculum and co-deliver the courses.
    The first Recovery Colleges opened in 2010, and there are now 32 across
    England, each working with up to 1,000 students at any time. But there has
    been little work studying the impact of Recovery Colleges.
    The aim of this study is to address three important questions.
    1. What are the defining characteristics of a Recovery College, and
    how does it differ from other medical and adult education
    approaches?
    We will interview 10 Recovery College managers to develop a tool to
    assess the presence of each necessary characteristic (a fidelity measure).
    This measure will be piloted with 3 Recovery Colleges) then evaluated with
    all Recovery Colleges.
    2. How do Recovery Colleges benefit service users?
    For example, self-referral may promote empowerment, jointly-delivered
    training may role model partnership working, and hearing a trainer talk
    about their own mental health problems may make the service user less
    pessimistic about their own recovery. We will interview up to 45 opinion
    leaders (e.g. service user students, Recovery College managers) to develop a list of possible mechanisms of action to formally evaluate Recovery Colleges.
    3. Who uses Recovery Colleges?
    About two thirds of students also use secondary mental health services,
    but there has been no detailed analysis of their service use, such as
    diagnosis, level of disability and how often they are hospitalised. We will
    study all available national reports and use the clinical information systems
    in 3 Recovery Colleges to understand who uses the college, and how they
    differ from service users who do not use the college.
    People with personal experience of mental health problems are at the
    heart of this proposal, including as applicants and advisors. We will also
    form an Innovation Network, to bring together all stakeholders (including
    service users, carers and staff) to support the study.
    This study will provide a foundation for a subsequent research programme

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/EM/0484

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Jan 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion