RE-BLEED

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    RE-BLEED: A digital platform for identifying bleeding patients – a feasibility study

  • IRAS ID

    292593

  • Contact name

    Peter Watkinson

  • Contact email

    ccrg.research@ndcn.ox.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Oxford / Clinical Trials and Research Governance

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 3 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Bleeding affects up to 40% of all trauma patients, up to 30% of all surgery patients and is one of the commonest causes of death for women giving birth. The presentation and features of bleeding are different between patients – in some cases bleeding is very obvious to recognise, but in other cases bleeding is more “hidden”, for example in the stomach. Bleeding must be stopped promptly to prevent severe illness or death.

    Many studies have shown differences in how patients who bleed are treated. There is also variation in how individual patients respond to the same treatment, with some patients doing better than others. Understanding how variation in practice and patient characteristics affect outcomes will help us design and test improvements in care.

    Patients in hospital have regular tests that measure levels of the different types of cells in their blood and its ability to clot. For example, a drop in red blood cells can indicate that patients have suffered bleeding. More advanced blood tests are available that can provide more detailed information on why patients are bleeding and what treatments might be most effective.

    This study aims to develop a real-time, hospital-wide digital system to identify patients in hospital who have suffered from bleeding and test whether this system could be used in the future to potentially identify patients to recruit into trials of new treatments or blood tests.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    21/SC/0290

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Nov 2021

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion