RADIATE: developing a core outcome set for Radial Dysplasia.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    RADIATE: developing a core outcome set for Radial Dysplasia.

  • IRAS ID

    221850

  • Contact name

    Malcolm Logan

  • Contact email

    malcolm.logan@kcl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    King's College London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/902, COMET registry reference number

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 2 days

  • Research summary

    Radial dysplasia is a limb anomaly affecting about 1:7,000 children born. Affected children typically have a missing or very small thumb and radius (one of the forearm bones), and abnormal muscles on the thumb side of the forearm. A number of treatment approaches are used worldwide, but there is no consensus on the most important outcomes of treatment. This makes it difficult to compare or combine results from different studies, and increases the risk of outcome reporting bias (where multiple outcomes are measured, but only 'significant' findings reported).

    This study will use a systematic search of the scientific literature on radial dysplasia to identify outcomes which have been measured in previous studies. We will then ask English-speaking key stakeholders from four groups (radial dysplasia patients aged 16 or over, families with children aged under 16 with radial dysplasia, children's hand surgeons and children's hand therapists) to suggest any other outcomes they feel are important, and to rate the relative importance of each outcome from 1 (least important) to 9 (most important) in a three round online 'Delphi survey'. In rounds 2 and 3, stakeholders will be given the average stakeholder score in the previous round for each outcome, then asked to re-score them. After round 3, outcomes scored as 7-9 by 70% or more participants, and 1-3 by <15% participants, will be included in the core outcome set.

    All participants will then be invited to a meeting (in person or via conference call) to ratify the core outcome set, and discuss how each included outcome should be measured. The final outcome set will be published in an open-access journal, for use by clinicians and researchers.

  • REC name

    London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    18/LO/1561

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Sep 2018

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion