RADAR PANC UK

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Recurrent diseAse Detection After Resection of PANCreatic adenocarcinoma using a standardized surveillance strategy (RADAR PANC UK). The UK arm of an international trial.

  • IRAS ID

    318048

  • Contact name

    Keith John Roberts

  • Contact email

    Keith.Roberts@uhb.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    The University of Birmingham

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT04875325

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 9 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Despite curative surgery for patients with pancreatic cancer (PDAC), almost all patients will experience recurrence around the same area or at another site in their body within 2 years. Currently, there is limited evidence of effective treatments for patients who have local recurrence only and in those with distant recurrence, chemotherapy improves survival by 3-4 months. Because of this, there is a reluctance to follow up these patients. In most European countries, there is no standardised follow-up following surgery for PDAC. However, more effective treatments are emerging focused on local and distant recurrence which is leading to interest in the early diagnosis of PDAC recurrence. Therefore, to identify patients who would benefit from these experimental treatments, a standardised follow-up of patients is necessary.

    The main aim of this study would be to assess whether a standardised surveillance would impact on the overall survival and quality of life in patients who have had curative surgery for PDAC compared to the current non-standardised practice.

    Patients would be randomly assigned to undergo either standardised surveillance or non-standardised follow-up. This standardised surveillance would include routine CT scans of their chest and abdomen every 3 months, a specific tumour marker and experimental biomarkers for the first 2 years after surgery. The main outcomes would be a comparison of the overall survival and quality of life of these patients. Other outcomes would include how well patients complied with a standardised surveillance programme, patterns of recurrence and the effect of standardised surveillance on patients being eligible for additional treatment for their recurrence and the tolerance of that treatment.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    24/WM/0132

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Jul 2024

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion