PSIP version 1.1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Positive Steps to Inclusive Palliative Care (PSIP)

  • IRAS ID

    354753

  • Contact name

    Felicity Dewhurst

  • Contact email

    Felicity.Dewhurst1@newcastle.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Newcastle University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 5 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Overview:
    The Positive Steps to Inclusive Palliative Care (PSIP) study aims to identify and address the needs of individuals with life-limiting conditions in Newcastle. Through analysis of focus groups and questionnaires, the outputs of the study will be used to co-design an inclusive, equitable care model tailored to participants' needs.

    Problem Statement:
    Many individuals face unmet needs in palliative care, including:
    • Unaddressed Needs: Physical, emotional, spiritual, and social support gaps.
    • Inequity in Access: Marginalised communities may struggle to access appropriate care due to poverty or cultural barriers.

    Objectives:
    1. Identify unmet needs in people with life limiting illnesses.
    2. Identify barriers and facilitators to culturally and socially inclusive care.
    3. Co-design an evidence-based model to improve accessibility and quality of care.

    Target Audience:
    • Patients: Individuals with life-limiting conditions registered at Newcastle GP practices.

    Methodology:
    1.Focus Groups
    • Purpose: In-depth discussions on experiences, unmet needs, barriers to and facilitators of appropriate palliative care provision.
    • Participants: 6-10 individuals per group, mixture of role and demographics.
    • Duration: 60-90 minutes.

    2.Questionnaires
    • Purpose: Broader reach for those unable to attend focus groups.
    • Format: Online and postal options.

    Key Questions:
    1. Impact of Illness: How does it affect your daily life and relationships?
    2. Current Support: What support do you receive, and is it effective?
    3. Unmet Needs: What additional support would improve your quality of life?
    4. Awareness & Accessibility: What do you know about hospice care? Are there barriers to access?
    5. Open Feedback: What else should we ask? How can we improve communication?

  • REC name

    East of England - Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    25/EE/0255

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Dec 2025

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion