Psilocybin TRD Feasibility RCT

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A randomised, placebo controlled trial of psilocybin in treatment resistant depression: A feasibility study

  • IRAS ID

    252750

  • Contact name

    James Rucker

  • Contact email

    james.rucker@kcl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    King's College London

  • Eudract number

    2018-003573-97

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 11 months, 27 days

  • Research summary

    Major depressive disorder is a burdensome and costly health problem for patients, carers, societies and governments. Resistance to medical and psychological treatments is common and this group are much more likely to be socioeconomically inactive, suffer from comorbid physical health problems and to die by suicide. Despite this, treatment resistant depression is under-researched and no new breakthrough paradigms of treatment have been developed since the introduction of the selective serotonin antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapy in the 1980s. Combinations of antidepressants and psychotherapy are more effective than either alone. The psychedelic drugs, including psilocybin, were used by psychiatrists prior to prohibition in 1970 for treatment resistant cases of depression, anxiety and addictions. Within a supportive therapeutic context they showed promise in this group, however evidence about safety and efficacy was inconclusive prior to prohibition. Since 2010 a resurgence of interest in this treatment paradigm has occurred. We have completed an uncontrolled, open-label pilot study of psilocybin with psychological support in 20 patients with treatment resistant depression that demonstrated the feasibility of delivering this treatment in this group of patients. The current study is a randomised, placebo controlled trial of psilocybin in up to 60 participants with treatment resistant depression. The objective is to test the feasibility of the randomised, controlled trial design with this drug in this patient group, to collect safety data and to estimate how many participants we would need for a larger, definitive trial.

  • REC name

    London - Brent Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/LO/0206

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 May 2020

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion