Predictors of orthodontic treatment outcome

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Predictors of orthodontic treatment outcome

  • IRAS ID

    168063

  • Contact email

    resgov@cardiff.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cardiff University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 9 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Healthcare has become increasingly evidence-based and the cost- and cost-effectiveness of NHS-funded treatment are important measures for commissioning bodies to plan and monitor services. Orthodontic treatment need in England and Wales is prioritized using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), whilst the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) measures the outcome of orthodontic intervention. The Index of Complexity, Need and Outcome (ICON) has the advantage of being able to determine case need, complexity and outcome in a single index.

    The aim is to determine important factors (patient, practitioner and treatment) that will predict a good orthodontic treatment outcome using the PAR and ICON indices as objective outcome measures. The LHBs (Local Health Boards) in South East Wales will contact all orthodontic performers practicing in the area and will ask them to provide details on 20 consecutively completed cases during the year 2014/15 which has been selected by the LHB.

    Treatment outcome shall be completed by the researcher attending orthodontic practices to undertake PAR and ICON on the 20 consecutive selected cases. The practitioners will fill out a questionnaire in order for practitioner factors to be collected. Treatment and patient factors on the 20 cases per practitioner will be provided by the relevant LHBs from FP17OW forms that the practitioners have completed and submitted.

    The study will be able to provide all interested parties information on the relative performance of orthodontic provision in the South East Wales region.

  • REC name

    London - South East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/LO/0209

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Jan 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion