Predicting language outcomes in children aged 2-4 years

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Predicting language outcomes in children aged 2-4 years and characterising how they learn

  • IRAS ID

    237701

  • Contact name

    Rachael Cheung

  • Contact email

    r.w.cheung@lancaster.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Lancaster University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 7 months, 18 days

  • Research summary

    Late talkers fall at the 10th percentile or below in vocabulary production compared to typically developing children at 2 years old. Although most reach the normal age-appropriate competency range, a proportion continue to have persistent deficits in receptive and expressive language, affecting academic and social outcomes. Little is known about how the mechanisms of word learning in late talkers differ compared to typically developing children, but existing research suggests they are less able to extract the structure of language from their environment. Furthermore, although language mediates children’s understanding of symbols and pictures, no studies have examined how this understanding might be affected in late talkers.

    Our research will involve testing both typically developing children and late talkers on word learning tasks and abstract non-verbal tasks at the age of 2 years. We will also collect data regarding the social ability of participants using questionnaires. The participants enrolled in the study will be followed up for a maximum of two years to the age of 4 to track their language development over time. We aim to identify differences that could lead to early identification of late talkers who will continue to struggle and to better characterise the mechanisms underlying late talking, including the effect limited language skills may have on non-verbal ability and the role of social ability in word learning.

  • REC name

    Wales REC 7

  • REC reference

    18/WA/0024

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Jan 2018

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion