Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA) of serious case reviews in South West Yorkshire Partnership Teaching NHS Foundation Trust: a pilot proof-of-concept study for research and training

  • IRAS ID

    372571

  • Contact name

    Luise Marino

  • Contact email

    luise.marino@swyt.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    South West Yorkshire Partnership Teaching NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    This pilot study will explore whether Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA)(1–3) can be used as practical research and training tools within South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. The study will work with serious case reviews and related documents already held by the Trust. It will not involve direct contact with patients or service users.
    Serious case reviews are often read for findings, recommendations, and lessons learned. This study asks a slightly different question. It will examine how the case is put together in the documents themselves: how concerns, risks, actions, decisions, responsibilities, and responses are described, and how particular ways of writing and framing a case can shape what later comes to seem reasonable, necessary, or difficult to avoid.
    PA and CPA are interview-free methods that focus on meaning in context. Rather than treating key terms such as “risk,” “non-engagement,” “complexity,” or similar labels as if they had fixed meanings, the study will examine what such formulations are doing in the documents and what practical consequences they may have for understanding, accountability, and organisational learning.
    The aim of this proof-of-concept study is to explore a pseudonymised data arising from clinical incident reports to see whether PA/CPA can help the Trust generate initial pilot data that could inform a future research project including practical training resources to support reflective practice, clearer documentation, and safer, fairer service learning. The pilot study using pseudonymised data set is intended to inform future collaborative work between the Trust and the research team.

  • REC name

    North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    26/NW/0170

  • Date of REC Opinion

    17 Jun 2026

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion