Postnatal perineal wound assessment

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The assessment of postnatal perineal wounds assessment: perspectives of midwives and women.

  • IRAS ID

    334946

  • Contact name

    Giada Giusmin

  • Contact email

    ggiusmin@brookes.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Oxford Brookes University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 10 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Around 85% of women who give birth vaginally experience a perineal wound, which could be a tear or an incision between the vaginal opening and the anus. Despite that, there is often insufficient exploration of how postnatal perineal wound assessment is conducted in healthcare research.

    Clinical guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) touch on the typical signs of wound infection but do not offer detailed guidance on the execution of perineal assessment. Existing research evidence is mostly focused on long-term complications, management of perineal trauma immediately after birth or severe perineal trauma. The limited research on perineal wound care highlights how poor communication and information provision harm women at a physical and psychological level, negatively affecting daily tasks such as caring for their newborns.

    Although there have been few studies examining women's or midwives' perspectives on perineal wound assessment in the context of uncomplicated wounds, their perspectives have never been jointly investigated to produce a comprehensive overview. Moreover, no research has had a clinical focus, investigating how the assessment is conducted in practice and what informs this practice, except from women’s reports of perceived sub-standard care received.

    Therefore, this proposed research is clinically grounded and aims to explore women’s and midwives’ perspectives on postnatal perineal wound assessment. This is needed to identify evidence-based practices, or lack thereof, in order to determine ways in which the experience can be improved for women and to have a more positive impact on their wellbeing.

    Eight to ten pairs of midwives-women will be first observed whilst the routine assessment is conducted to understand what happens during this episode of care, and then they will be separately interviewed within a few days to gather further understanding. Recruitment will be in a single centre, which is a tertiary unit in the UK.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    24/SC/0248

  • Date of REC Opinion

    29 Aug 2024

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion