POINT

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, add-on, superiority study to compare the efficacy and safety of ponesimod to placebo in subjects with active relapsing multiple sclerosis who are treated with dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera®)

  • IRAS ID

    206803

  • Contact name

    Basil Sharrack

  • Contact email

    basil.sharrack@sth.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

  • Eudract number

    2012-000541-12

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 4 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    This is a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study to compare the efficacy and safety of ponesimod against placebo in patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis, who are currently being treated with dimethyl fumarate.

    The purpose of the study is to test if the study drug is safe and effective at treating the disabilities associated with the patient’s multiple sclerosis.

    About 600 people will participate in the study. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive treatment with either placebo or ponesimod, alongside dimethyl fumerate. Patients who participate will be supplied tablets to taken orally once a day. After the treatment ends patients will return to their regular medical care for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

    A number of assessments and procedures will be performed during the study including physical examinations, blood sample collection, quality of life questionnaires, urine sample collection, eye and skin exams, chest X-rays, MRI’s, electrocardiograms (ECG) and lung function tests. These assessments are performed as part of the evaluation to determine if the study drug is safe and effective.

    The study will be run at approximately 6 centres in the UK and is sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/EM/0155

  • Date of REC Opinion

    27 Jun 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion