Ph 3 Study: RLY-2608 + Fulvestrant vs. Capivasertib + Fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutant HR+/HER2- ABC
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Phase 3 Open-label Randomized Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of RLY-2608 + Fulvestrant Versus Capivasertib + Fulvestrant as Treatment for PIK3CA-mutant Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (HR+/HER2-) Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Following Recurrence or Progression On or After Treatment with a CDK4/6 Inhibitor
IRAS ID
1004610
Contact name
Sabrina Khalil
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
The study is designed to learn about the effectiveness and safety of the experimental (investigational) drug called RLY2608 in combination with fulvestrant compared to capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant when given to individuals who have been diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer and have at least one mutation in a gene called PIK3CA.
RLY-2608 in combination with fulvestrant was tested in a previous study (ReDiscover) with a group of patients and has shown encouraging results. This new study aims to confirm the evidence of benefit seen in the ReDiscover study in a larger group of participants compared to standard therapy with capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant to find out which is better for treating this type of breast cancer.
The study is being done to find answers to the following questions:
• Can RLY-2608 combined with fulvestrant help patients with this type of cancer more than capivasertib combined with fulvestrant?
• What are the side effects of RLY-2608 combined with fulvestrant compared to capivasertib combined with fulvestrant?This is a randomised, open-label study. Participants will be randomly assigned (like a coin toss) to receive either:
• Group A: RLY-2608 in combination with fulvestrant
• Group B: capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant
Participants will have a 50% (1 in 2) chance of being assigned to Group A or Group BREC name
London - Westminster Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
25/LO/0738
Date of REC Opinion
29 Oct 2025
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion