Personality Disorder and Probation

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Exploring individuals’ experiences of working with probation who have personality disorder: A community-based participatory action research approach.

  • IRAS ID

    347535

  • Contact name

    Alyson Norman

  • Contact email

    alyson.norman@plymouth.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Plymouth

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 11 days

  • Research summary

    Personality Disorder (PD) is a mental health diagnosis that affects 50% of those on probation, and 60-70% for individuals in prison (NHS & National Offender Management Service, 2015). It is a diagnosis that is often viewed negatively by the general public, nurses, prison officers and probation practitioners. As a result, staff can find it difficult to work with individuals with PD, feeling they are hard work and difficult to trust. Individuals with PD who are in the criminal justice system (CJS), either in the community or prison, can find it difficult to build helpful supportive relationships with staff as a result of these negative views held around the PD label, and the impact PD can have on their behaviour.
    Research has focused primarily on the views of probation practitioners in working with individuals in the CJS with PD. Research has been conducted about individuals with PD, but not those within the CJS, and has not looked at their experience of probation. This research project has been created with individuals in the CJS with likely PD who would like to study how people with PD experience probation.
    The research will ask people from a male prison estate who self-identity as screening in to the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway, a joint NHS and Prison and Probation (HMPPS) service. This service is for individuals who are in the CJS and would likely attract a diagnosis of PD. The study will ask these individuals questions in an interview about their understanding of PD, as well as their experience of working with probation, specifically what might have helped or hindered their working relationship. The aim of the study is that people’s answers could impact future training for probation staff by making sure it reflects people’s lived experience of what does and does not work.

  • REC name

    North East - York Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    25/NE/0009

  • Date of REC Opinion

    8 Jan 2025

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion