Outcome of Selective & Nonselective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Randomized clinical trial of treatment outcomes of selective versus nonselective caries removal in deep carious lesions in permanent teeth.
IRAS ID
335444
Contact name
Francesco Mannocci
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
King's College London
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Duration of Study in the UK
6 years, 1 months, 1 days
Research summary
Patients presenting with deep decay within permanent teeth presents a common clinical challenge to dentists. The aim of this trial is to compare the success rate of the non-selective caries removal (NSCR) and selective caries removal (SCR) in managing deep caries, as both methods are commonly used in clinical practice.
This study will be a randomized controlled trial, with participants divided into two groups: NSCR group and SCR group. Both groups will undergo either NSCR or SCR, followed by Partial Pulpotomy (PP) in cases with pulp exposure. Success rates will be assessed at follow-up visits scheduled 1-, 3-, and 5-years radiographs will be used to assess for pulp health(vitality).
The success rate of the two categories will be assessed using a scale that includes factors such as tooth vitality, caries recurrence, and clinical signs of pulpitis. The scale will be applied at follow-up visits. The trial will be conducted in post-graduate dental clinics at Guy's hospital.
Deep caries in permanent teeth is a common clinical problem that can lead to pulp exposure and subsequent restorative challenges. The aim of this study is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in managing deep caries lesions, as both NSCR and SCR are commonly used in clinical practice. The results of this study will help clinicians to make informed decisions when choosing the appropriate treatment approach for their patients.
In conclusion, this trial aims to compare the success rate of NSCR and SCR in managing deep caries lesions in permanent teeth, as both methods are commonly used in clinical practice. The results of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of these two treatment approaches and will help clinicians to make informed decisions when choosing the appropriate treatment approaches.
REC name
West Midlands - South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
24/WM/0106
Date of REC Opinion
10 Jun 2024
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion