Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Lenalidomide

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Have Relapsed or Progressed After Treatment With Ibrutinib or Are Refractory or Intolerant to Ibrutinib

  • IRAS ID

    179376

  • Contact name

    Simon Rule

  • Contact email

    simon.rule@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Celgene International S.a.r.l

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 3 months, 15 days

  • Research summary

    This is a non-interventional study to determine the activity and safety of lenalidomide either as monotherapy or as combination in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients following ibutinib treatment. MCL patients who require treatment after receiving ibrutinib therapy are considered a population with high unmet medical need. It is therefore of benefit to have data on the outcomes of treatment options available in this patient population.

    Data will be extracted from the medical records that is already existing or being recorded for MCL patients treated with lenalidomide.

    MCL patients who received lenalidomide either as monotherapy or as combination treatment after having relapsed or progressed on ibrutinib treatment or were refractory or intolerant to ibrutinib treatment are eligible for the study. Lenalidomide does not need to be the next subsequent treatment after ibrutinib.

    Data of approximately 30 patients will be included in this study. About 6 patients will be recruited in the UK.

    Participants will require to sign consent. All patients will have retrospective (looking back in time) data collection.

    There are no study procedures associated with this study.

    This study is funded by Celgene Corporation.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0397

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 May 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion