NORSHOCK
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Clinical Outcome and Cost-effectiveness of Reduced Noradrenaline by Using a Lower Blood Pressure Target in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock from Acute Myocardial Infarction
IRAS ID
354410
Contact name
Alastair Proudfoot
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Amsterdam University Medical Center, AMC
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
2021-005551-36, EudraCT number; 2024-510892-40-00, EU trial number
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 5 months, 31 days
Research summary
Rationale: Pump failure due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can lead to cardiogenic shock (CS): a state of low blood flow to end-organs with subsequent multi-organ failure that is associated with high mortality rates. The first line pharmacologic treatment strategy in CS is noradrenaline to maintain adequate blood pressure. The current guidelines have a weak recommendation for targeting a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mmHg in order to improve flow and thereby tissue perfusion of the myocardium, kidneys and other organs. However, there is no evidence that an increase in MAP, if achieved by noradrenaline, leads to higher end-organ blood flow and better outcomes. The use of noradrenaline may compromise myocardial blood flow in this condition and thus lead to infarct size expansion and worse clinical outcome.
Objective: With this study we aim to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of reduced noradrenaline in patients with CS by using a lower MAP-target of ≥ 55 mmHg, compared to standard care (target-MAP usually ≥ 65 mmHg). We hypothesize that reduced use of noradrenaline will improve overall survival and decrease renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy.
Study design: Open label, randomized controlled multicenter trial
Study population: Adults patients with CS due to AMI
Intervention: Treatment strategy of reduced noradrenaline use, by means of a lower MAP- target regimen ( ≥ 55 mmHg).
Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: composite of all-cause mortality and severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30-days after randomization. Secondary endpoints: duration of catecholamine therapy, enzymatic infarct size, hemodynamic parameters, length of stay in hospital and Intensive Care Unit, quality of life.
Follow up: 30-days, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year after randomization. At follow-up information on organ function (blood test, echocardiography) will be gathered, if part of routine care. Additionally, patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire at 30-days, 3-months, 6-months and 1-yearREC name
North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
25/NW/0133
Date of REC Opinion
20 May 2025
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion