Normal Values of Urodynamic Pressures Using eSense Catheters

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Normal Values of Urodynamic Pressures Using e-Sense® Catheters

  • IRAS ID

    357469

  • Contact name

    Andrew Gammie

  • Contact email

    andrew.gammie@bui.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Laborie Medical Technologies

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT06905808

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 6 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    Urodynamic pressure measurements are currently normally transmitted from the patient to the transducer via water-filled catheters. Over the decades, a large amount of data has resulted in a guideline for the normal range of pressures.

    Recently, catheter-tip measurements have come onto the market, using either air-filled balloons or electronic sensors, that will have different pressure readings, if only because they record the pressure at the position of the catheter tip. Studies in air-filled catheters have suggested that there may be other factors contributing to the measurements made for example interaction of the bladder wall with the transducer or poor transmission in an empty bladder. It is therefore appropriate that the new e-Sense® catheters have this same assessment compared with a water-filled line.

    Urodynamic measurements are made during the process of filling the bladder with saline. Pressures are measured within the bladder, via urethral catheter, and outside the bladder but within the abdomen, normally via a rectal catheter. The action of the bladder muscle can be inferred from any rise in the pressure within the bladder relative to the surrounding abdominal pressure.

    The pressures will change according to the position of the patient – supine, seated or standing. It will thus be necessary to measure pressures in each position and at different bladder volumes.

    Subjects who are referred to undergo Urodynamics will be recruited to participate in the study. Initial resting pressures will be measured/recorded in supine, seated and standing positions using both catheters at the time (dual-catheterized) for each subject. The study will collect various urodynamic pressure values at regular intervals during bladder filling. The pressures before filling will be compared with the pressures collected during bladder filling to determine normal pressure value ranges. Urethral pressures will also be measured with both catheter systems and compared.

  • REC name

    South West - Frenchay Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    25/SW/0058

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Jun 2025

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion