MR only radiotherapy planning

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    MR only radiotherapy planning: a feasibility study

  • IRAS ID

    176782

  • Contact name

    Martin Pickles

  • Contact email

    m.pickles@hull.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    The purpose of this research is to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ‘only’ pathway for radiotherapy planning. Traditionally, radiotherapy planning was undertaken with only computed tomography (CT) images. CT images provide information regarding the electron density. This information is used to help determine the necessary radiation dose required for the prescribed radiotherapy treatment. However, while CT images are very good at looking at certain types of tissue (bone, lung) these images are less useful when considering soft tissue.

    Many tumours develop in soft tissue e.g. prostate, brain and cervix. MR images provide excellent soft tissue contrast; consequently, tumours can be better demonstrated on MR than CT. In recent years this has led to the development of CT/MR radiotherapy planning whereby CT provides the electron density information and MR delineates the treatment tissue. However, this technique requires the two sets of images to be fused (registered). This registration process can introduce errors into the radiotherapy planning process. Additionally, there are extra costs (MRI scan and registration) related to this CT/MR technique.

    Recently, a number of research groups have demonstrated it is possible to produce synthetic electron density information from MRI data alone. Consequently, the intention of this research is to explore the possibility of MR only radiotherapy planning and to compare the resulting radiotherapy plans against CT derived radiotherapy plans.

  • REC name

    London - Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/LO/0644

  • Date of REC Opinion

    15 Apr 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion