Microthin DSAEK vs DMEK - RCT
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Microthin corneal endothelial keratoplasty (MT DSAEK) versus Descemets’ membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): A randomized clinical trial of corneal transplant outcomes and visual function
IRAS ID
201097
Contact name
Madhavan Rajan
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 11 months, 31 days
Research summary
Corneal disorders resulting in corneal opacification is a significant cause of blindness in the UK and remains the second commonest cause of blindness in developing world. Recent innovations in corneal transplant techniques (Endothelial keratoplasty) had shown significant benefit to patients in relation to visual function, rapid post -operative recovery, minimal hospital stay and fewer complications. Endothelial transplants are prepared from human cadaveric donor corneas either using a mechanized microkeratome (Microthin DSAEK) or by manual dissection (DMEK) with variations in surgical technique. So far, there has not been an attempt in literature to compare Microthin DSAEK with DMEK. It is important to establish the clear benefit between these two techniques in order to provide informed choices to patients, surgical teams and eye banks.
REC name
London - Fulham Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/LO/1343
Date of REC Opinion
21 Jul 2016
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion