Mi-ECMO

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A FEASIBILITY STUDY TO CONSIDER THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MARKERS OF RED CELL DAMAGE, INFLAMMATION AND THE RECOVERY PROCESS OF NEWBORNS REQUIRING EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION (ECMO) FOR PERSISTENT PULMONARY HYPERTENSION OF THE NEWBORN (PPHN)

  • IRAS ID

    191592

  • Contact name

    Gavin J Murphy

  • Contact email

    gjm19@le.ac.uk

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Respiratory failure in newborns is common and has high rates of death. Where conventional intensive care strategies have failed, newborn children are referred to treatment with Extra- Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). This involves connecting children via large bore cannulas placed in their heart and major blood vessels to an artificial lung that adds oxygen to their blood and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide). Although this treatment saves lives, it still has some limitations. In particular, severe complications like bleeding, or damage to the kidneys can occur. These complications can lead to death in some cases and long-term disability in others. Based on our ongoing research in adults and children undergoing cardiac surgery we have identified a new process that may underlie some of the complications observed in ECMO. We have noted that when transfused blood is infused in an ECMO circuit, this results in the accelerated release of substances from the donor cells that cause organ damage; at least in adults. There are treatments that can reverse this process. Before we explore whether these treatments should be used in newborn children on ECMO, we must first demonstrate that we can measure the complex inflammatory processes that occur in these critically ill children. We therefore propose to conduct a feasibility study to identify the practical issues and challenges that would need to be overcome in order to perform a successful trial in this high-risk population.

  • REC name

    North East - York Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NE/0398

  • Date of REC Opinion

    23 Dec 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion