Mental health and treatment needs of UK ex-service personnel: v1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Mental health needs and treatment needs of UK ex-service personnel accessing IAPT services in England

  • IRAS ID

    224664

  • Contact name

    Deirdre MacManus

  • Contact email

    deirdre.macmanus@kcl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    King's College London

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 5 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Providing for the mental health needs of veterans is a UK government priority. In order to ensure that we have services that meet the needs of this population we must know if and how their mental health differs from the general population of NHS mental health service users and whether or not generic treatments offered by NHS services are as effective for those who have served in the military.

    In the UK, there have been no formal comparisons of how the mental health of help-seeking veterans may differ to help-seeking non-veterans. Currently the majority of veterans with mild to moderate mental health problems, such as non-severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders and depression, are likely to receive psychological treatment in generic NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services if they seek care in England which is where IAPT operates. There is, however, no data robustly examining whether these generic treatments are effective for veterans and whether the outcomes differ to non-veterans.

    The current study will be able to address these issues by examining nationally collected data from NHS IAPT services and comparing the clinical presentations and treatment outcomes of veterans with non-veterans.

    The outcomes of this study will be (i) important data on the clinical characteristics of the veterans who access generic NHS psychological services compared to the non-veterans, (ii) whether or not these generic services are as effective for this population compared to the non-veterans who access them, and (iii) how treatment outcomes may vary by clinical subgroup (e.g. diagnosis, severity of symptoms, comorbidity etc).

  • REC name

    West Midlands - South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/WM/0147

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Apr 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion