Liaison and Diversion Services for Children: A Qualitative Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Liaison and Diversion Services for Children: A Qualitative Study

  • IRAS ID

    318961

  • Contact name

    Charlotte Lennox

  • Contact email

    charlotte.lennox@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Manchester

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    N/A, N/A

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 2 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Background:
    Children and young people (CYP) in contact with the youth justice system often have complex needs including mental health problems and high-risk behaviours. Early intervention and meaningful assessment is important. Liaison & Diversion (L&D) services provide support through the early stages of the criminal justice system and divert CYP away from the criminal justice system and/or refer CYP to appropriate support services. There is little research, especially qualitative research about the implementation of L&D for CYP.

    Aim:
    The aim of this study is to understand L&D services from the perspective of CYP, families and clinicians.

    Funder:
    The study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research

    Methods:
    a) We will conduct a series of interview with:

    1 CYP referred to L&D services
    2 Family member of CYP referred to L&D services
    3 Clinicians who work in L&D services
    4 Other professionals who work with or provide input to L&D services (e.g. those from the police, courts, health and social care settings etc.)

    CYP, families and clinicians will be recruited from NHS L&D services. Other professionals will be recruited from services which work with, or provide services within L&D teams.

    b) CYP who take part in the interviews will also be invited to take part in observation, where a researcher will observe the CYP engaging with the L&D activities and take notes on how these activities work.

    Analysis:
    We will code the data and look for themes across the interviews which explain experiences of access assessments. We will use these themes to produce a report of the findings which outlines how L&D services are currently running.

    Outcome:
    We hope that the findings from this research will help clinicians to make better assessments and decisions about CYP who are referred to L&D service.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    22/WM/0246

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Dec 2022

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion