Joint loading vs normal physiotherapy care in degenerative knees (V1)
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A progressive joint loading protocol versus normal physiotherapy care in the management of degenerative intra-articular knee pathology
IRAS ID
161032
Contact name
Steven Foster
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 2 months, 0 days
Research summary
This study is a randomised controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different exercise based treatments in the management of patients with knee problems related to degenerative (wear and tear) changes. Recent evidence suggests that putting weight through a joint (joint loading) may be beneficial.
We know that physiotherapy and exercise is important in treating these patients, but we do not know which exercises work best. In this study we will be comparing current physiotherapy care against a new programme of exercises that gradually increases the amount of joint loading.
The study will recruit approximately 140 patients from the Leeds Musculoskeletal (MSK) service, who are over the age of 45 and have been referred for physiotherapy by their GP for activity related knee pain. Patients who are suitable and happy to take part will be selected randomly (not chosen by the patient or physiotherapist) to receive either normal physiotherapy treatment, or the knee loading exercises. The treatment phase will last for six weeks and participants will be asked to carry out their exercises twice daily during this time. At the end of this period, they will be asked to complete questionnaires and again at six months so that we can assess how they are doing.
The main aim is to evaluate clinical effectiveness of the progressive joint loading protocol. However, the data collected will also be used to see if there is a way of identifying in advance those who might respond better to either treatment.
We will also collect some information relating to the cost effectiveness of delivering different treatments. The final aim of this study is to test how easy it is to collect more detailed data in this area if a related study were to be carried out in the future.
REC name
Yorkshire & The Humber - South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
14/YH/1163
Date of REC Opinion
27 Oct 2014
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion