Interest and use of technology by individuals with SMI

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Interest and use of technology for self-management purposes by individuals experiencing serious mental health problems: Service user and clinician perspectives.

  • IRAS ID

    199121

  • Contact name

    Natalie Berry

  • Contact email

    natalie.berry@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Manchester

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 18 days

  • Research summary

    Both psychological and pharmacological interventions are recommended for individuals who experience psychosis and bipolar disorder (serious mental health problems, SMI; NICE, 2014a; 2014b). However, access to psychological therapies is often poor and sometimes people are unwilling to seek face-to-face therapy due to factors such as perceived stigma, lack of time and/or motivation, and doubts over efficacy. Therefore, researchers have increasingly been developing and delivering psychological interventions online and via mobile phones for people experiencing SMI. Examples of online and mobile phone-delivered interventions include, but are not limited to, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), psychoeducation, and mindfulness based approaches. However, little is known about how individuals with SMI currently use technology to manage their mental health and what elements they would like to see incorporated into interventions delivered via technology. In addition, clinician views regarding the utility of technology-delivered interventions have largely been ignored in research in this field.

    It is important to investigate the experiences, views and attitudes towards technology use in people with SMI, as it will be these people directly engaging with interventions delivered in this format. As such, qualitative interviews with individuals experiencing SMI will be administered to determine:
    i) how people with SMI currently use technology for self-management practices;
    (ii) individuals views and attitudes towards technology delivered interventions;
    (iii) perceived facilitators and barriers to use;
    (iv) experiences of using the internet and mobile phones for self-management.

    Furthermore, clinician views about technology use in SMI and technology-delivered interventions for this population need to be explored. As such, clinicians working in primary and secondary care settings will be recruited for interviews or focus groups to explore:
    i) clinician experiences of service users utilising technology for their mental health;
    ii) clinician attitudes towards interventions delivered online and via mobile phones for people with SMI;
    iii) how clinicians feel technology could help and/or hinder clinical practice.

  • REC name

    East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/EE/0059

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Feb 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion